<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Researching Meditation &#187; head-to-head comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.researchingmeditation.org/blog/tag/head-to-head-comparison/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.researchingmeditation.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The ideal control</title>
		<link>http://www.researchingmeditation.org/blog/the-ideal-control.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.researchingmeditation.org/blog/the-ideal-control.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr Ramesh Manocha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dr ramesh manocha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head-to-head comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramesh Manocha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sham meditation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.researchingmeditation.org/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may not be practically possible to devise and implement an ideal control method for meditation trials, nevertheless it is important to select a strategy that approximates that ideal. The bare minimum criteria for a control process in meditation research should therefore be: • First, high face validity as a therapeutic/stress management intervention in its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may not be practically possible to devise and implement an ideal control method for meditation trials, nevertheless it is important to select a strategy that approximates that ideal. The bare minimum criteria for a control process in meditation research should therefore be:</p>
<p>• First, high face validity as a therapeutic/stress management intervention in its own right. It should actually appear to be a credible meditation technique if that is the expectation of participants.<br />
• Second, a process that involves relaxation and reduction of somatic arousal since this is the nearest conventionally understood phenomenon that meditation resembles and from which it needs to be distinguished.</p>
<p>Given these considerations there are two ideal strategies: <a title="Meditation Research - Sham Meditation" href="http://www.researchingmeditation.org/blog/sham-meditation.html" target="_blank">sham meditation</a> and the <a title="Meditation Research - Head-to-head comparisons" href="http://www.researchingmeditation.org/blog/head-to-head-comparisons.html" target="_blank">head-to-head comparison</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.researchingmeditation.org/blog/the-ideal-control.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

